Clinical Inquiry and Reporting Tools
Connect Care is, at its core, about inquiry. We participate in inquiry when asking questions about what we do, perform investigation when answering questions systematically, and promote improvement when iteratively using answers to do better.
The clinical information system (CIS) offers diverse tools for clinicians, improvement advocates and researchers. These help understand how the CIS is used and how health processes and outcomes change for CIS stakeholders.
Inquiry Support Tools
Different CIS inquiry support tools serve different question types and answering strategies. Some help stimulate curiosity, others help generate hypotheses and still others help investigators to test hypotheses. All are available to all users, but with role-dependent exposure of identifiable health data.
Reporting Workbench ("My Reports") - can be used to generate real-time clinical, operational, quality and research reports in a variety of formats, with support for drilling down to supporting data and taking action with clinical and administrative decision-supports. These work best for smaller data retrievals and sub-populations. Clinicians and managers can facilitate chronic disease surveillance, find patients meriting proactive interventions and track clinical and system performance.
Crystal Reports - present more standardized analyses in attractive, easy to interpret, formats that serve performance optimization, quality assurance and other improvement purposes.
Slicer Dicer - facilitates interaction with graphical representations of population health data so that patterns of health risks, processes and outcomes can be better visualized, hypotheses generated, and quality improvement tracked.
Dashboards (Radar) - summarize and visualize data of various types, again with self-service data exploration tools and the ability to drill down to more detailed data.
All reporting tools can be expressed in different formats for embedding in clinical and managerial workflows.
Different types of data are have greater precision or accuracy as CIS implementation progresses through adoption, stabilization and optimization. CIS usage data may be trustworthy early on whereas outcomes data requires more time, and meaningful CIS use, to attain validity. AHS has adopted processes for multi-disciplinary review of data sources and for readiness-badging of the associated reports.
In general, we encourage seeking reporting proficiency many months post-launch. The products of inquiry support tools are unlikely to be fully validated until at least 6 months of quality content accrues. Visual cues highlight inquiry supports that are endorsed by Connect Care oversight.
Ensuring that Connect Care in-system dashboards, metrics and reports work as expected is a continuing improvement activity. Many measures (e.g., lab utilization, minimum use norms compliance, etc.) are sensitive to changing denominators during CIS implementation and transitions. Accordingly, it is important to know which measures have been tweaked sufficiently to be trustworthy. A Connect Care report certification process provides easy-to-recognize visual quality markers.
Once a given dashboard or report is certified, a ribbon icon appears on dashboard thumbnails, with blue signifying certified Dashboards, purple signifying certified Reporting Workbench reports and orange signifying certified Crystal reports. Measures, reports and visualizations that are not certified should be used with caution.
Inquiry support tools are available to all clinicians. Prescribers, including physicians, can use Connect Care to facilitate personal practice audits, device and drug safety checks, clinical performance improvement and other improvement activities.
Different levels of formal, ad hoc and embedded training are provided to help clinicians "tool-up" for inquiry when the time is right.
Introduces Cogito, highlighting difference between analytic and operational reporting needs and matching tools.